<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What about symbolic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.foppiano.org/2008/07/23/what-about-symbolic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.foppiano.org/2008/07/23/what-about-symbolic/</link>
	<description>this blog is a feature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Crippa</title>
		<link>http://blog.foppiano.org/2008/07/23/what-about-symbolic/#comment-13088</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Crippa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bayzone.wordpress.com/?p=528#comment-13088</guid>
		<description>Working on &quot;enterprise projects&quot; is never easy: customers ask unlikely things with impossible timing, and you need to run to keep their faith. It (sometime) makes your life a terrible mess, but do you really prefer to manage small project, with 4 or 5 end users... with a poor infrastructure?

I think enterprise world is very hard but really exciting: overtaking problems (usually not simple problems), improving processes and performances, reducing costs (not your cost, but &quot;other&quot; cost, of course...) are satisfying results of your work and your &quot;mind&quot;, that are visible for thousands of end-users  :-)

Your (boring) project is near to the end (not the project but your involvement)... and Symbolic is near to be ready for a &quot;real full time development process&quot; in Byte-Code... so, you should be ready to jump back into symbolic again

But Symbolic still remain (and will remain!) a fully opensource project (community based). Byte-Code can sponsor it, but it is open, and anyone can join without restrictions. Forever and ever. So I think you remain one of the &quot;core&quot; developers of Symbolic ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working on &#8220;enterprise projects&#8221; is never easy: customers ask unlikely things with impossible timing, and you need to run to keep their faith. It (sometime) makes your life a terrible mess, but do you really prefer to manage small project, with 4 or 5 end users&#8230; with a poor infrastructure?</p>
<p>I think enterprise world is very hard but really exciting: overtaking problems (usually not simple problems), improving processes and performances, reducing costs (not your cost, but &#8220;other&#8221; cost, of course&#8230;) are satisfying results of your work and your &#8220;mind&#8221;, that are visible for thousands of end-users  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Your (boring) project is near to the end (not the project but your involvement)&#8230; and Symbolic is near to be ready for a &#8220;real full time development process&#8221; in Byte-Code&#8230; so, you should be ready to jump back into symbolic again</p>
<p>But Symbolic still remain (and will remain!) a fully opensource project (community based). Byte-Code can sponsor it, but it is open, and anyone can join without restrictions. Forever and ever. So I think you remain one of the &#8220;core&#8221; developers of Symbolic <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
